An interesting, but more or less predictable perspective:

“They need to catch these kids and make them pay for the damage they have done, teach them a lesson,” Justin Wright said. “It’s not right to damage other people’s property.

This is probably an excerpt from a longer interview, but it’s still interesting insofar as the perspective is oriented around the centrality of (private) property. For many, property is undoubtedly not a negligible element of life, but it’s nonetheless worth noting that property is especially important to those who own property. One question, then, is whether “lesson” proposed includes incorporating the violators into property owners proper or, at least, subjects willing and intending to reproduce a system of private property?

What’s striking is the elevation of damage to property to the same level as potential injury to or loss of life. Moreover, these two threads are somehow the only points worth reporting. What’s interesting, then, is this particular way of abbreviating what must have been a much longer story. Surely this cannot be all that is relevant to the story?

Share

Why does the administration exercise its sovereign state power only to authorize the plundering of its own citizens?

羅淑蕾表示,中國旅行業者在中國招攬旅客,都是用「賒帳」的方式,先把旅客找到、帶到台灣,等行程結束後再分期與台灣旅遊業者結帳,但旅客離開台灣,中國旅行業者卻向台灣方面表示「找不到人」,積欠帳款也沒有辦法支付,2年半下來積欠金額高達50億元。

It’s tempting to just demand those damned, dirty Chinese to keep their stinking paws where they belong, but it’s obvious that a conspiracy is being orchestrated from within. There’s no reason to believe otherwise especially when you already have army generals lined up to sellout the country.

Share

Every now and then, WSJ manages to publish a piece of total garbage.

Share

Why is it legal for a minor to masturbate? Perhaps I’m mistaken, and it actually is illegal . . .

Share

“I’m so bored. I hate my life” (Britney Spears).

Share

Total classic–still true after all these years (though I have no idea whether elevators have always worked the way they usually do nowadays).

Share

Overcharge for parts and labor

(though at least they didn’t try to sell me their credit card; not that they’re at all above doing that if given the chance)

Out of the three repairs that I needed to pass inspection, two were significantly overpriced both for parts and labor.  The one that wasn’t overpriced happened to be a service that was conspicuously and regularly advertised on their wall; they probably conceded it wouldn’t be possible to jack up the price on that one without making it utterly obvious.

What I have trouble believing, though, is how stupid and desperate they were to try to pressure me into signing off on the repairs right away: “If you don’t do the repairs now, we’re going to have to put a rejection sticker on your car . . .” Well duh, I know that, and I also know that you purposefully left out the part where I am entitled by state law to return for a re-inspection within fifteen days.  Besides, if I’m going to drop a couple hundred dollars on repairs, would I really care about spending a few more dollars to get inspected even if I miss the re-inspection deadline?

(Not obviously) I declined to do my repairs with them.

Q: What brand of filter?

A: (insert shop name) brand

How ridiculous is that?  Unless, of course, they were afraid to let me know where they actually got their dubious generic product.

Credit card, anyone?

Customer next to me is informed that the necessary repairs will be expensive, but:

If you apply for this card we just happen to carry, not only will you be able to pay us the exorbitant charges, you’ll also enjoy the extra privilege of getting it up your ass from the credit card company, which (and we won’t  hesitate to shamelessly and emphatically point out) is really good for you since you’d be getting screwed at a rate that’s (questionably, if at all) less usurious than you might get from  the competition (that is, your own credit card company–in case our chicanery was not adequately persuasive, causing you to remember that you actually already have one and needn’t gratuitously apply for another one).

As bad as this may appear already, it shouldn’t obscure the fact that it’s actually worse than it looks. The exorbitant charges are not only needlessly but also purposefully inflated–which is their standard practice whether they’re trying to sell you their credit card or not.  Of course, the fact that they’re leveraging the safety inspection deadline to pressure the customer certainly helps boost their quota.

Share

Welcome to 臺大網誌服務 NTU Weblogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Share
© 2011 Ultra-Bourgeoisiology Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
Since 2010 total of 18151 visits